dbreunig:

Ignore the IPO noise for a moment: the criticisms, the estimates of earnings, and other buzz. These pale in comparison to Facebook’s largest achievement, which is worth putting into context.

Facebook has organized roughly 1 in 7 people on earth, or 900 million people.

They’ve built a design and interaction system used across the world by a massive amount of cultures. Mandarin, with its 1.1 billion speakers, is the only language or medium with more native participants than Facebook. Other companies certainly fill out this club: Ikea, Microsoft, Nokia, Samsung, and Apple come to mind. But none of these live so closely to their participants, acting and reacting with them.

You may be over Facebook, but Facebook’s cultural impact has yet to peak. Facebook itself is a tremendous feat of design and engineering, no matter what network is on top in 5 years.

The comparison to Mandarin here is astute.

First, Thibodeau and Boroditsky asked 1,482 students to read one of two reports about crime in the City of Addison. Later, they had to suggest solutions for the problem. In the first report, crime was described as a “wild beast preying on the city” and “lurking in neighbourhoods”. After reading these words, 75% of the students put forward solutions that involved enforcement or punishment, such as calling in the National Guard or building more jails. Only 25% suggested social reforms such as fixing the economy, improving education or providing better health care

Not Exactly Rocket Science describes a Stanford experiment illustrating the power of metaphors and language.

The words you use matter.

(via dbreunig)

The Muin is The Yird’s ae naitural satilyt (or muin), an the fift mukkilest muin in the Solar seestem. The average centur-ti-center faurness frae the Yird til the Muin is 384,403 km (238,863 mile), aboot thrittie tyms the girst o the Yird.
During the blackout, Megan discovered the fantastic Scots language wikipedia. Enjoy this selection from the Muin.

(via dbreunig)

As part of its continued expansion as a lifestyle brand…

The intro to Gibson’s PR release announcing their purchase of Stanton, KRK, and Cerwin-Vega.

This has to be the scariest lede possible for guitar nerds. It makes me sad.

(via dbreunig)

It’s in Apple’s DNA that technology alone is not enough — it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our heart sing.

Steve, thank you for making hearts sing.

If you can argue using your mother language then you can argue using data visualization. If you can’t, data visualization will not help you.
Whereas the options are limited for differentiating graphical elements, you can differentiate texts any way you wish. Nuances are used to express causality in language. Graphics, however, provide no room for leeway. Due to the complexity of the financial crisis, diagrams that primarily avoid text quickly become grotesque because they simplify the world to a point where we can no longer recognize it. If we simplify things too much, they might not make sense any more.
A lot of folks in tablet market are looking at this as the next PC, hardware and software done by different companies, and they’re talking about speeds and feeds, just as they did with PCs. Apple’s experience says that that’s not the right approach; these are post-PC devices that need to be more intuitive.

Steve Jobs talking about the iPad 2 via Dan Moren

I agree that “a lot of folks” focus on the wrong things.

Maybe I was right, maybe I was not right,” he said. “They gave me this chance. I had the chance to fabricate something to topple the regime. I and my sons are proud of that and we are proud that we were the reason to give Iraq the margin of democracy.

Defector admits to WMD lies that triggered Iraq war | The Guardian

Reminds me of what I found most interesting about Bush’s War, which is that the way to start a war is to talk and talk and talk until you persuade people to do it.

We don’t know why the Tucson killer did what he did. If he is like Sirhan, we’ll never “understand.” But we know that it has been a time of extreme, implicitly violent political rhetoric and imagery, including SarahPac’s famous bulls-eye map of 20 Congressional targets to be removed — including Rep. Giffords. It is legitimate to discuss whether there is a connection between that tone and actual outbursts of violence, whatever the motivations of this killer turn out to be. At a minimum, it will be harder for anyone to talk — on rallies, on cable TV, in ads — about “eliminating” opponents, or to bring rifles to political meetings, or to say “don’t retreat, reload.
The Cloudy Logic of ‘Political’ Shootings - James Fallows - The Atlantic

It is legitimate. I’m not interested in scoring points for either side of the aisle, but I am interested in fixing the metaphors we all use.

I'm Jed Sundwall. This is my blog, which you can follow on Tumblr or via RSS. You can talk to me on Twitter.